Wednesday, May 11, 2016

FINAL SUMMATION

this is basically a stream of consciousness........so please excuse any confusing wording.......

i cant think of a final summation without thinking about this school year entirely. what a crazy CRAZY ass period of dismantling self made rules in my life and art practice and completely rewriting them for myself. i really truly feel so empowered and my desires are different or maybe not even different just far more clear (i almost wrote queer) for me. Me using my body, live and in space changed a lot of things for me. maybe not even changed things but sparked so many more opportunities and possibilities within my life, my practice and my work. It is sort of like that moment you melt two metals together when you are welding and you see it happen before your eyes. you see each metal slipping into one another until they both are dissolved and become homogenized. homogenizing is not what im after but i think im after the split second where the metals are racing around one another beginning that interaction and understanding and almost question-meant or confrontation. or even water into oil and how the water and oil confront one another until, with these materials there is another resolution- a final state oil over water.

also through performance my relationship to object making has shifted. or maybe not even shifted but become a tiny little bit more clear..transparent..it feels oddly right bringing these things into the world. it feels necessary for me, which is important. i also think another thing that i have begun to consider more is site whether through live performance on site or sites mediated through video or found material etc. i get really excited thinking about the way a site can be mediated through me and then transformed/transplanted into new materials, energies and stories. The dirt was such a move for me- something i would never have considered before hand but its a powerful medium for me. it begins dialogues with communities (neighborhoods) outside of my own personal one and begins to make larger pools where intergenerational experiences are unearthed and revealed. understanding the spectrum of oppression and marginalization for lgbt/queer bodies is vital in my own practice. I think that is maybe why my performance style is so bodily and degrading because i am trying to understand the past, present and future simultaneously. 

i do not consider myself a character when i perform. it is me. it is max. the costuming is no different then when i dress to go out for the night or dress to go to the studio. costuming or dressing for myself is a means of survival. i make my own rules of how i dress. what i dress. where i dress. when i dress. why i dress. i have that power. i have that restraint. i dont have to consider the binaries constructed for me. i can dismantle them. i can reevaluate them and how they situate within my life. i think this also begins, for me, conversations about queer beauty and its consumption by the heterosexual society (heteronormativity). how can our bodies not be consumed? how can our beauty not be consumed? we are always being consumed by the majority- by the status quo. thats why its about a confrontation for me. a dominant role rather then a submissive one. and urgent one rather then a passive one. thats also something i think i have began to flesh out this semester is the type of viewer i am after. i desire for an active participant in my work not someone who is passive (i think these ideas were sort of covered in my second piece). i want someone to invest themselves into it. i want people to question themselves in it. i want people to intervene themselves in it. i want people to confront themselves in it.

I think with the latest piece i did i was definitely thinking a lot about lineages of the "same" experience and how they can create dialogue between one another which insulates, informs and manifests off of one another. The lineages of past homosexual and queer men (lgbt in its entirety) and then implementing my body to become a submissive passive character (in my minds eye) to carry out these tasks. i have only received one crit response from isabel and i just got done talking with laurel but in both responses aggression was bought up but not necessarily in a confrontational way but in a way that i was manifesting aggression as a material and it was coming from me and through me thus creating a cycle of sorts.

wow i could honestly keep talking. but i do look forward to what you thought! with work after school i am just excited to inhabit a new space and time and place and people and environment and see how that shifts my practice. i know that the urgency to create will always be there. i hope the drive will but alas it is alright. i am so excited to see what the future holds. i think my practice will obviously have to get a lot more "smart" in terms of $ and space. time and locations are free...well sort of haha! good luck with grades and such i hope you can make it out to Black Iris on friday 7-9, irvin and the class are having a night of performances should be a lot of fun! 

Saturday, March 26, 2016

WLAM Responses

The WLAM presentations, dialogue and discourse have been far more fruitful than anticipated. I think I especially felt this when basically the entire class voted for Mika Rottenberg and then during the group discussion completely ripped her apart about her consumption of labor with out a personal understanding of the value of her own labor. A sensitivity, awareness and accountability are all on the forefront of discussion these days which is refreshing because it means that ideas, morals, opinions, groups of marginalized people are not swept under the rug. I also enjoyed the conversation around Jacolby Satterwhite and the ways in which he is navigating the art world. We all were so critical of his art school write up of his own work but then noted (shed light on) his authorship and how its been erased from the beginning of time and by him putting his work into his own terms he was accessing his power and freedom and reclaiming it on his own time to give people only what he wants to give. He does not allow you to think about many other things because he is giving it to on a silver platter. Giuseppe Penone was interesting because of the Arte Povera movement that Penone was apart of, but i guess what blows me away about him is that his work now revolves around those trees which seems so far away from the ideology of Arte Povera but alas. All in all though the conversations have been far more richer then I anticipated. However, i do look forward to seeing what miranda and catherine bring in for all of us! 

Friday, March 25, 2016

Crit 2 Response

it has taken me a while to even want to write this response because the piece took so much out of me and is still so fresh and new in my eyes. there is so much room to continue to play with that/those pieces and fine tune each of them even further. i was so happy to finally bridge my video work with my body in real time. the cherry on top was my ability to bring objects into the world and not feel like they are a bastard. also, audio is really scary but also really exciting. i loved how i was able to give each object a sound which then controlled my movements and actions. I do agree that the timing of the piece was either too short or too long ( i think it was too short ) for me, when i am performing i want as much time as possible so i can really get into the mental space i go to when i perform. I want to dislocate my self, dissociate my self, distance my self from myself. it is not a character. it is me. it is me. it is always me. 
i want to keep re-performing this piece. I want to see and understand how it manifests in different times and spaces. in different head spaces and mental states. in front of different groups of people. the audio still needs work and for me needs to be more understood by myself. i think its an important material to the work but i need to more appropriately utilize its effects and pacing abilities. I think the sounds need more space and less clutter well maybe the clutter was working because then it forces this object, body, action relationship that interests me as a performer. Another thing about this piece that is important to me is that all of it was made by hand without the use of power tools (except the wood cube structure) but for the most part everything was made with small tools which is something that i have been trying to get into the habit of doing because i will not have all this machinery once i am out of school. this is not a necessity to the work but i am definitely thinking about it while i am making. 

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Thursday, February 11, 2016

Crit 1 response

My last first critique...how bittersweet. I was/am energized by the discourse surrounding the work I presented yesterday. I get excited and enriched when the conversation goes right into ideology, concept or perspective towards the constructs of the world. The stock videos offered up a lot of room for me to maneuver and play while simultaneously reinforcing a lot of the ideas I am concerned with. The saturation and inundation of imagery is something I am constantly investing in because it creates a magnetic energy that consumes the viewer. The stock videos also made me think much more about layers and how they interact or fail to interact, the boundaries between planes, space and visibility. Stock videos are the 'status quo' the 'normal life' and maybe its not that they ARE but that they are SIMULATING the 'status quo' silently reinforcing structures of expectations. I think the funny part about utilizing the stock videos was that I was in turn SIMULATING an event or experience surrounding my personal pedagogy. I was using the user.
Malcolm wrote 'the ambiguous, confused queer body being used as a puppet, object, a prize that is not desired....simply an object to be laughed at then forgotten. While trying to find its skin and its presence it is struggling without a community and this is powerful I think' Malcolm talks with such clarity and eloquence. Even when Miranda began talking about armature in relation to gender constructs and the limiting effects it has on all of us they were activating the discourse. I think about a lot of the things said yesterday on a daily basis. I am constantly checking in with myself and editing myself which in turn begins to dissolve these limiting placeholders that are stressed upon.
I was interested in how people  began to only talk about the one on the far wall (taking off clothes). It definitely had the most going on (the final video had 196 layers) visually but I also think conceptually. At the same time most everyone stated or wrote that the pieces work best together and not as separates which HOLLA I am all about multi channel projections. I also am into video to video relationship (imagery, action, color palette, etc).
Overall though I was pleased with the dialogue and left the critique really energized to keep making. I will say..this was the first critique in awhile where I went into it completely in love with what I was showing. That sounds really vain or narcissistic while I am typing it out and even thinking about it in my head but whatever.
In my process pictures you will see that I made objects (screens) to project on but I just was not attached or in love with them. The objects were not in service of the videos and visa versa so that is why I knixed them. I also felt (After having a conversation with Kotone definitely helped) that the videos had so much content that adding another layer would detract and convolute EVERYTHING and make it muddy when it does not have to be.
Moving forward I want to incorporate my live performances with my video work and see what happens then. I have been thinking about the body a lot and you wrote down 'I wonder about a fourth wall that could be just a projection of light that makes images out of the viewer' which I found interesting but I began thinking about extending my body in space too. Also adding silhouettes (you mentioned also) to the video to simulate/play with viewer interaction and relationship to space and the video(s)/performance. I am very excited to see what unfolds. I feel liberated. Which you mentioned a lot throughout the critiques specifically Zach, Sang and I.     

PROCESS






























Tuesday, January 26, 2016

FIRST PROMPT

Armature

/ˈärməCHər,-ˌCHo͝or/
noun
  1. 1.
    the rotating coil or coils of a dynamo or electric motor.
  2. 2.
    a metal framework on which a sculpture is molded with clay or similar material.

We investigate only what is on the surface. What is easiest to see, gather, acknowledge. How do we go further to understand the Armature, the underbelly, the inner workings of systems, living organisms, the mind, space, time, infrastructure etc.? 

Also I am always aiming to further my use of screens and what 'screens' are/mean to/for the consumer, both projected and stationary television. How can I intervene and disrupt that flow? 
   
Stilted and Stunted, 2015
Wax Play, 2015
Onion Cleanse, 2015
Fruity Massage, 2015
Laddered, 2015
Selphied, 2015
Grouped, 2014
 "That's not how you do it", 2014
Flossing, 2014
 The Way of the Flowing Stream, 2014
Hanging Out, 2013
No Not "Faggy" Passionate and Self Assured, 2013

Sunday, January 24, 2016

PAST SCULPTURE TEACHERS

FALL 2013- Michael Jones Mckean
SPRING 2014- Ester Partegàs
FALL 2014- George Ferrandi
SPRING 2015- Ester Partegàs
FALL 2015- A.L. Steiner 
TOP 10 ARTISTS FOR WLAM

1. Jacolby Satterwhite
2. Ryan Trecartin
3. Isa Genzken
4. Juliana Huxtable
5. Carolee Schneeman
6. Matthew Barney
7. Rachel Harrison
8. Trisha Baga
9. Mika Rottenberg
10. Heim Steinbach
INTRO SURVEY QUESTIONS

*LAST UPDATED 1/27/2016 @ 3:08 AM*

What is the power in the world that you most want to transform or overthrow and why?

The power in the world that I most want to overthrow is the status quo and expectation placed on individuals identified bodies through and from politics, culture, advertisement, entertainment, etc. Just because my identified body is male does not mean I have to be prescribe to reinforced gender binaries and roles of “masculinity” such as active, aggressive, dominant and ambitious. For female identified bodies expectations of “feminine” are nurturing, expressive, cooperative, and sensitive towards the need the others. Even these roles can be seen as outdated in the contemporary society with a push for this binary to be dissolved. Men have a greater expectation for a higher sensitivity to feelings and stronger communication skills. Women now have an expectation for both children and a career and the development of assertive qualities. Why are these expectations placed on bodies? The qualities and traits I have mentioned should not be compartmentalized. These emotions, qualities or traits are not derived from gender and are disconnected from the binaries. These expectations originate from politics, culture, advertisement, entertainment, etc. for example the patriarchay (“government that exclusively supplies systems created almost exclusively of male ideology and triumph”), porn made exclusively and dominantly of male pleasure and climax while utilizing the consumption of female bodies, advertisement and media for years have lacked equal LGBTQIA representation and often utilize stereotypical roles of marginalized groups. The hierarchal system that controls and insulates our everyday is engrained into our society because of the inundation and control of politics, societal norms, media, images, text and signs we experience everyday which is seen as satisfactory and compliant to all. When anyone counters these ideas they are seen as traitor or other. The dominant group actively /others/ entire populations of people for these reasons. "To refuse to be conscious of what we are feeling at any time, however comfortable that might seem, is to deny a large part of the experience, and to allow ourselves to be reduced to the pornographic, the abused and the absurd."       

What is the power in your life that you most want to transform or overthrow and why?

The power in my life that I most want to transform is my ability to stand up and defend what I believe in rather than be passive, silent or intimidated. I want to transform this passive power into active power. I want to practice what I preach and not just say things to hear my voice. Being concise with my language is also something I am constantly trying to edit and transform. I want to mean what I say and not just simple add more content to the world. I have sat in silence for a long time and refuse to keep quiet

What is something in your life you want to further empower and why?

Something in my life that I want to further empower is my ability to take care of myself and care for my body rather than hurt it through 'comfort' or 'reliance' (ie. cigarettes, alcohol). My eating habits are sporadic and I can definitely tell you I do not get enough vitamins, nutrients, proteins and water that I should. I also do not work out enough even though I actively try. School is an obvious factor for me as is sleep but like I said the more I 'suffer' I feel so engrossed in my practice and what I am making that I do actively make the 'sacrifice.' I also understand how dramatic this sounds but it is really not. But, after school, my body could be my practice for a bit. (*becomes a yogi*) 

What is something in the world that you want to further empower and why?

Something I want to further empower in the world is to be less passive and aware of what they are doing. Actively assess yourself, surroundings, friends, actions, motives, feelings, ridicule etf. *SEE FIRST ANSWER*

In what aspects of your artwork so far do you feel strongest?

An aspect that I feel strongest about in my artwork is my ability to be vulnerable. I do not have reservations about making myself uncomfortable or feel shame for my interests, actions or language. I also am not afraid to admit when I am wrong or have done wrong. This vulnerability has permeated much of my existence and helps me understand my androgynous and queer interests. Self-objectifying the self before the other can objectify is an act of survival as well as a power move on the self’s part. Another aspect I feel strongly about in my artwork or even more practice-wise is self promotion. I reach out to people all the time through instagram, facebook and tumblr about various things ranging from simple conversation, to techniques used in pieces, to potential work or assistant positions. It is important for me to feel rejection and 'no' because in the end that builds the backbone for resilience and determination.     

In what aspects of your artwork so far do you feel weakest?

I know this is broad and general but in most aspects of my artwork I feel that its weak. In the sense that I still have so much to learn and consider/qualify and understand before I make a 'successful' piece of art. Once I have finished a piece, documented it and uninstalled it all I have are those pictures. When I look at the pictures a few days later I always, without failure, think to myself "what the fuck was I thinking? why did I do that? I need to do this.." I am always pushing myself to grow, read more, see more, ask more and listen more. Now thinking about an aspect of my artwork that I feel the weakest towards or about is my ability to make objects. like only objects. nothing more. no videos or projections. It never feels like enough or that I am giving enough. It does not seem substantial enough. I would love to be able to feel confident in the making of things but I always feel inadequate. I hate that I think me making videos is a cop out of some sort because it definitely is not. I think videos are objects. Me not making objects also is not a cop out because I have good building skills I used to make things all the time but I have hit this road where I just feel stumped or overwhelmed or not enough time to make these things happen (which I recognize as a cop out). 

Who would you list as the five artists (either contemporary or historical) that interest you? Why?

Leigh Bowery: His creativity, shock value, performance style, collaborations and life story are immensely complex while also retaining a sublime edge that attracts and dissolves the reality that we exist in capturing peoples attentions and interests because of the cultural, political, gender and sexuality subversion. Leigh was so vulnerable and shameless. He was not caught up in other people's opinions. His collaborations with Michael Clarke are important to me. I was a dancer so seeing dance as even more of an art form before through their application and my experience offers momentum. Shock value is something that I do not think is necessary all the time but I do enjoy pushing limits.  
Ryan Trecartin: Trecartin's quantity (obviously due to collaborators' help) is insane and intimidating but makes me want to consider everything about the shot down to if the cinderblocks are real or not. He is harnessing and synthesizing so much content that it is a little bit of a headache but it also makes you feel uncomfortable and anxious, maybe you will look away and then turn back because you can't help but look back. I want that moment where it, the work or the content, confronts you.
Jacolby Satterwhite: Jacolby's quantity is also immensely inspiring. I love his utilization of his mother's drawings in his most recent work. I have used my family in prior work and is something I am interested in exploring again but from a different lens amount of involvement/direction.. Jacolby also uses green screen and mo cap capabilities and programs like blender (I think) and probably Maya so those things I want to further my knowledge with. The worlds he is building interest me because space and gravity and reality are nonexistent he is making his own reality and world.  
Ron Athey: I don't even necessarily like his art or mutilation art in general BUT what I take away from it is pushing the body to its limits which exists on an obvious spectrum. A lot of my videos have become about pushing my body to limits and seeing how long I can hold this pose, or putting a candle in my butthole and lighting it and letting it burn completely. These are not gore-y or even in your face graphic but you can see and understand the body being hurt and degraded.  
Anna K.E.: Anna utilizes her body in most if not all of her videos that I can find online. She abstracts her body disrupting the landscape, scene or rectangle in which you are viewing it. She also uses various mediums like drawings, sculpture, installation and video together and separate which makes me want to paint more I guess or draw or even just begin thinking about those actions and mediums more actively instead of passively. Her style and palette are also heavily attractive to me it has a punch and a presence.  

Name two of the favorite artworks you have ever seen?

This is a hard question. I remember one of my first pivotal experiences with art was the Picasso exhibition at VMFA when I was a junior in high school, it left me speechless. The depth, amount and spectrum of work was enamoring and utterly inspiring. I saw Samara Golden’s The Flat Side of the Knife at PS1 and again was left speechless. Technically, conceptually, installation-wise I was overwhelmed. I reached out to her and worked with her when I was in Los Angeles. She is a truly inspiring, caring and soft individual. I saw a group show at The Kitchen called No entrance, No exit with Anna K.E., Alina Tenser and Viola Yeşiltaç. Specifically, Alina and Anna were utilizing projections and screens and they way they were implementing them was fresh and innovative and got me excited about the idea and possibilities of videos, screens, projections and consumption of this media.

Are you indoorsy or outdoorsy?

I identify as and with both.

What subjects in the world outside of art most interest you?

Subjects outside of art that interest me on a personal level, in no particular order, are cooking (quiche enthusiast), working out (yoga, running, bicycling, swimming), reading (fiction, nonfiction, theory (queer, feminist), philosophy (aesthetics, metaphysics), journals (gender, sexuality and class), biographies (activists, artists). Outside of a personal level I’m interested in volunteer work with youth specifically LGBTQIA youth and the role the arts play in youth within educational institutions.

Name three people that are no longer living and are not artists that interest you and why?

Ron Hubbard-I watched Going Clear which is about Scientology which after I told a few friends that my new partner practiced Scientology they advised me to watch this film. There are parts in the film of Hubbard being interviewed and holy shit he is crazy and absurd and sort of brilliant but in an obvious exploitive, fantastical, grandiose manner. He also made people believe in a random new 'spiritual' 'religion' or whatever you want to call it, which is the most craziest part. And then when he was being investigated by the government for not paying his taxes he got on a ship and sailed around the globe....who the hell does that? He is insane.

Name three living individuals who aren’t artists who interest you and why?

Chris Kraus- I read one of Kraus's book last summer called 'Video Green' which dealt with the revival of the LA art and music scene, her adventures in kink, cruising and BDSM, life and death and art history mixed with moments of anecdotally passages about random relationships she has had with people. She weaves all these topics and interests so easily into one another and the text never feels disjointed or random there is a flow. There is also this criticalness of self and surroundings that is intoxicating to me.
Paul Hamm- Paul Hamm was my favorite gymnast growing up. He is effortless on the rings, p bars and floor exercise flying so gracefully through the air. Being a gymnast, let alone, a gymnastic olympian takes a lot of strength, discipline and pushing and understanding your body. I am interested in how far we as people can push our body physically before it responds back or cracks. 
Michael Warner-Warner is the author of Fear of a Queer Planet and is considered one of the founders of Queer Theory. Warner wrote Fear of a Queer in 1991, 3 years before I was born. Reading his texts makes me feel so alive and I relate and can understand and sympathize. He interest me because of his writings, topics and discourses but also because of the time period AND if I gave that book to my mom and dad and asked them to read it they would be blown away and just unaware of that whole infrastructure controlling the world which really just blows me away.

How is your work political?

My work is political because I am taking stances or rather proposing questions about the structure of our society and value/moral system. Most of my work deals with politics towards agency over any physical body not identified as the status quo or dominant group. My work is political because I am investigating ideas about white privilege, oppression, sexuality and gender binaries very forwardly and potential at face value. There is a push though on my part to mask these things with serene surroundings and calming audio or soothing palettes. I really need to locate that middle ground where I am inserting concept with action through aesthetics all in one or separate and come together.   

How do you use social media in your life? Do you want more or less?

I utilize social media everyday of my life. It has connected me with people I would have never known about or even thought about exchanging dialogue with. The potential for discourse is insane. The amount of educational and factual information that you can digest is spell bounding for me. Obviously, the sheer quantity, influx and inundation of media on these platforms are problematic because the black hole effect it creates. The copy&paste and share society is now. I want to find a balance with social media. Make it less about numbers and more about communication and connection with other people, galleries, museums, spaces, artists, performers and activists.  

If everything goes you’re the way you wish it would at this moment, what will you be doing two years after you graduate?

If everything goes my way after I graduate I will have hopefully been to a few residencies and continue to develop my practice. I hope to begin exhibiting my work and performances with galleries located anywhere. I hope I will be living in Los Angeles with my partner. I hope to have my own living space and my own studio space. I hope to expand and develop new (and formed) relationships with people. I hope to create discourse. I hope to focus more on my health and well-being.

Does gender play a conscious role in your work? How?

Gender plays a conscious role in my work but through me actively trying to dissolve the binaries. Gender binaries are constructed for the heterosexual society to help create compartments. I identify, practice and understand(ing) the androgyne [non-binary gender identity associated with androgyny]. The androgyne is understood through lived experience, discourse and mentality, not just decoration or appearance. It is an acute awareness to self in relation to the other. There is a difference in what a subject “does” and what a subject “is.”

How does your race and issues surrounding race influence your work?

My white privilege is something I have dealt and deal with within my practice. How do I de-privilege my inherently born privileged body is a question I ask myself and consider a lot in relation to my performances and work. Through these actions I hope they begin conversations about the power structure of community, state and nation as well as the patriarchy. How can this privilege an power be reassigned and redistributed into a new hierarchal scale based on emotions, on morals? I think about unearned systems of dominance and privilege, which are delivered and assigned through race, gender and/or sexuality. The privileged groups (white privilege) unawareness and un-acknowledgement of their privilege perpetuate ideas that everyone shares the same amount of privilege or that it does not even exist at all. This invisibility, from the dominant group, creates and reinforces a status quo or “normal” life, an idealized human expectation. Members of dominant groups are conditioned to not see themselves as privileged because they are able to identify the only more blatant forms of discrimination enacted against marginalized groups. Privilege is actively reproduced and distributed by the privileged dominant groups. I am also aware of the intersection between where oppression and privilege exist. When individuals are unable to recognize their privilege because they are so focused on their oppression they become unable to recognize their role in keeping others subordinated, silenced and suffocated.

What is a physical material that you have worked with that feels more powerful than your body?

A material that I have worked with that feels more powerful then my body is molten hot bronze, aluminum or tin. The process of pouring metal controls you. You walk and move its way.

What is a social material or subject that you have worked with that feels more powerful than your autobiographical experience?

A social subject that is powerful to me is power of the erotic and agency over body. The Uses of the Erotic by Audre Lorde is among some of the text I read and sourced. Also, vulnerability and shame. 

Is your sexual orientation something that figures into your work? How?

Me being gay and queer play a vital role in my work and practice. All of my work deals with my sexuality and on a larger scale with expectations placed on any body other than heterosexual specifically homosexual. A concept I explored in one of my videos was that positions aren’t people and people aren’t positions. Just because my identified body is compartmentalized within the lgbtqia community, as “twink” does not mean I identify as one. A twink is "The quarry of a homosexual prostitute (male); a man willing and ready to become any dominant man's 'partner' in Wikipedia’s terms. Submission and dominance are not derived from a body type, rather a mentality or simply a desire to be penetrated. Even certain homosexual kinks are deemed unfit by psychologist upon which one can be diagnosed with an ‘illness.’ And what majority group of people deems these acts unfit? Heterosexual people dominated by heterosexual men. Me being queer and gay are intrinsic aspects to my identity and how I interact with the world and is something I am proud of not because it makes me “different” that’s not real but because I can feel so full and comfortable with what I want and need from another human and the ability to not feel shame or disgrace in that. Self-closeting is a reality some people face and something I hope I can help to shift in the future through volunteer work. Yes I can marry whomever I want now but there is still so much work to be done within the lgbtqia community, specifically for transgender-identified bodies. Even further, black transgender identified bodies.            

How do current events affect the way that you make art? Give an example?

This question is one of the last ones I answered because I would like to think I make work about current events but I don’t think I do. I think some of work responds emotionally and reactionary to current events in some form but its not directly utilizing these events. Current events, technology and goods are important and of interest to me and I definitely want to utilize more of these forms of information and events.

Do you use art history as an ingredient in your work?  How or why not?

I used to think utilizing art history as an ingredient in work was a problem but now I am so excited to utilize past works, ideas and people as a way to add more flavor to my work. I definitely do not actively implement it but I have become far more aware of history in relation to my own practice. It also is not a problem to be inspired by others work and to utilize it in my own practice though. It furthers a conversation and idea and begins a web of interconnection between artists from all walks and places.

Does your lack of sleep make you feel stronger or weaker?

Stronger. 

What is your fantasy working/studio environment? Where is it and what does it look like?

I really dislike talking in fantasy terms (ha ha) BUT I would have a designated space for a green screen and studio lights to do performances for videos. It could be in Los Angeles, New York City, Rural farm/ranch land, Overseas in Europe (Brussels, Berlin) or maybe Mexico City? Anywhere? I would die to have a computer and computing system that can handle intense 3D renderings and video editing capabilities so the programs don’t unexpectedly quit or are unable to render because of disk space. A lot of natural light is a positive. A space for woodshop tools, materials and an overall work space would also be a positive but making things happen with what you have is also an exciting idea for me. Working from a place of speed, frantic-ness and desire to create are things that ultimately do interest me. ALSO: A FAIR AMOUNT OF PLANTS and some type of fish.

Do you want to make a lot of money in your life? Why? How would you ideally like to make that money?

I would be lying to you and myself if I said I would not like to make a lot of money or even enough to live ~comfortably~ whatever that means. Having the ability to make my ideas and dreams come to reality will obviously take monetary value, time and hard work. This does not mean living in excess. I try to practice conscious living and not living outside of my means but if one has a lot of money they inherently/subconsciously probably/most likely live outside of their means. Ideally, I guess, I would love to make if off my art or in an art related field (gallery or curatorial) but am not opposed to doing odd end jobs unrelated to art or sculpture to make a living. I just do not believe anybody will want to buy the videos or objects I make.

How do you think about your diet?  What is a typical day look like in terms of eating and drinking? Do you see that as a personal or social choice?

I think about my diet quite often. It’s important to eat healthy and understand where the food is coming from. But financial reasons stunt those things from happening a majority of the time. I rarely eat a balanced breakfast; I usually have coffee to wake me up and either a banana, yogurt or cliff bar. Lunch is usually non-existent. Dinner is usually some form of protein, veggie (fiber, protein, healthy goodness) and complex carb (pasta or rice). I do actively drink water throughout the day, which helps with keeping me full and hydrated (great for the skin). I think eating for me is both a personal and social choice. Socially I go out to eat with my friends but I have a say in where we eat and what I eat while I’m there. I try to eat organic and local as often as I can. I also only try to go to locally owned restaurants.

Can you name three specific experiences your have had in your life that you would be curious to transform or feed into an artwork?

I remember being 8 or 9 and strutting out of gymnastic practice at this gymnasium called ‘All-Star Gym’ in Shirley, New York on Long Island. I had just landed my first back handspring and HAD to call my grandmother to tell her the news. So I grabbed my mother’s cell phone out of her purse and climbed in the car to call my grandmother and tell her what happened and just the amount of excitement I had was enormous and thought she would feel the same but it was not reciprocated. at all. It let me down. Another example was my first sexual experience with a male when I was 13. We were both heterosexual at the time. It was July 4th and I went to his house after we watched fireworks. We watched Knocked Up and then went to bed and I remember he was in his bed and I was on the ground and he asked me how big my penis was and if he could touch it. Of course I said yes because I was/am gay and he gave me a hand job and did not want anything in return. After I climaxed he was different about the whole experience and never really talked to me again. My last experience is when I was a child (4 or 5) I would force my two female cousins to sit down with me so I could paint their nails. They did not ask for it or even necessarily want it but I desired so badly to be a nail technician. 

Identify some aspects of your past work that people have challenged/had problems with that you want to confront this semester?

One question that gets brought up is the scale of my work and the shift in scale that my installations have. I want to really begin utilizing scale more and having the bodies or objects in the videos be larger then the viewer. Through this scale shift a relationship to scale will be generated between the bodies and figures being projected and the viewer’s body in the room. Also qualifying and further understanding my use of space and why objects are arranged a certain way. Do I utilize objects in a space to visually look the ‘best’ or does my use of space indicate larger ideas about force, control, spatial signifiers or public vs. private secotrs?

Identify some aspects of your past work that other people have found interesting, inspiring, or provocative that you to further pursue?

By using my body, specifically my nude body, people find it provocative but not sexual or shocking but rather a way to strip myself down and having nothing to hide behind. People outside of the art community find public nudity to be such a taboo. Another aspect is my use of green screen and world building, creating spaces, and mashing/collaging spaces together. For some reason, even though I think my editing skills are crap, people believe and buy into the spaces and begin to understand them as reality. I find this intensely interesting because I am not trying to fool anybody because it is obviously edited but that suspension of space and even time excite me (7th or 8th dimension I think).

What general conversations about peers work have you felt lacking and want to pursue (ie. To think more about politics, history, materials, form, techniques, influences, etc)?

A major conversation that continually goes unacknowledged is the authorship of work. A majority of my peers make work about their lived experience and identity yet during critiques these vital topics are either never talked about or are only talked about by a few people because a majority of the class is unwilling to talk about and confront any issues outside of themselves (and their born privilege). These “uncomfortable” conversations about racism within the institution, community and world, heteronormativity and the LGBTQIA community are necessary and vital to have and create discourse. By unwillingly un-acknowledging these factors it is dehumanizing and erasure to these artists. It reinforces a status quo and stereotype of bodies and dialogue in the Western world and institution.

Hippies? More or Fewer?

Indifferent

Do future technological developments excite or scare you? Or both? How?

Future technological developments excite me more than they scare me but there is a hint of apprehension. The way we consume media and information is something I utilize in my work, practice and everyday life. Then what we do after we consume this information is also of interest. Through developments we will no longer utilize a tactful viewing experience the experience will now be lived. Our bodies and technology will experience a commensalism relationship, where our bodies are helped and the technology is neither helped nor harmed. Outside of our relationship to technology will change, technology, as a medium in art is the most exciting. 3D rendering software, 3D printing, CNC/plasma cutting, green screen/mo cap capabilities, video camera capabilities and video editing software will all develop and become far more sophisticated, user friendly and applied to areas like medicine and transportation (they are 3D printing organs like wtf?). To think that a 3D printer will be a norm in every household is laughable to some but an actual reality.  

Name several artists that you have come across in the past year that you want to learn more about?

(in no specific order): Juliana Huxtable, Felix Bernstein, Meriem Bennani, India Salvor Munuez, 

What aspects of these artists work would you like to engage with your own work?

Both India Salvor Munuez and Juliana Huxtable I would both identify as a spectrum of things alongside artist and fit into a category all their own. They are muses. India is a succesful actress, performer, model, radio host and zine producer. Juliana is a successful poet, model and DJ. Juliana effortless utilizes text in her art work which on its most basic level is something I want to start activating more in my practice is writing/text/books/poem. India is an amazing performer from what I have seen and has become apart of this amazing collective of performers that are all her close friends. JEALOUS AF!!!! Her performances, from pictures, deal with the body, contact improv, dance, character and set building, rituals and much much more. Meriem Bennani's work is riddled with dark humor. Her most recent show at Signal Gallery in Brooklyn utilizes these two mapped projections that where on inverted pieces of foam, wood or some rigid material. Her use of material and projection and the relationship they were having was inspiring and captivating. Begin to  disrupting the expectation of the screen. Feliz Bernstein is hilarious to begin. His sense of humor and attitude are inspiring in the performance realm. He reminds me of a lesser Trecartin with his face makeup, speech articulation and the synthesizing of pop culture and the 'now' generation. Bernstein is also a poet, writer and critic which again interest me on the baseline level of publishing my writings. Bernstein's poems are dark and rich of heavily melancholy diction. Depictions of the perfect life gone astray or askew. Also obviously queer/gay text. Bernstein is very open about it and that is something I also do in my practice.    

List five questions that you want to fuel your work?

1. How do you activate/disrupt your body in space and site? How do you inspire others to activate/disrupt their body?  How do you respond: mentally, physically, bodily, dialogue etc? 
2. How can you disrupt the expectations and experience of the screen?
3. Is the arrangement of objects, screen, projectors and cords considered and utilized in a successful way?
4. What limitations are placed on the body to alter the way in which you do a task, move in space, exchange dialogue? Why? 
5. Disembodiment, disembodiment, disembodyment